<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arts &#38; Letters Daily &#187; “For” and “four”; “stake” and “steak”; </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aldaily.com/for-and-four-stake-and-steak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aldaily.com</link>
	<description>ideas, criticism, debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 22:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>“For” and “four”; “stake” and “steak”;</title>
		<link>http://www.aldaily.com</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwescott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Books]]></category>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“For” and “four”; “stake” and “steak”; “peak,” “peek,” and “pique”: Why is<strong>English spelling</strong> so complicated? The trouble started in the sixth century&#8230;<a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/f90b88dc-462f-11e2-b780-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2FiN1oOSo">more<strong>»</strong></a></p>
]]></description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>